Although government-sanctioned force is used less openly today in the West to advance political and religious agendas, it is still commonly used in the name of mental health. The checkered history of the involuntary confinement of noncriminal patients reveals that this practice rests on pseudo-scientific assumptions and has undermined legal rights and individual responsibility.z
The Case Against Psychiatric Coercion
By Thomas S. Szasz
This
article
appeared in
the Spring 1997 issue of The Independent Review.
Civil Liberties and Human RightsFDA and Drug RegulationFreedomGovernment and PoliticsLaw and LibertyPhilosophy and ReligionThe Nanny State
Other Independent Review articles by Thomas S. Szasz | |
Winter 2005/06 | Defining Disease: The Gold Standard of Disease versus the Fiat Standard of Diagnosis |
Spring 2001 | The Therapeutic State: The Tyranny of Pharmacracy |