Does the existence of brute luckchance events and circumstances that are beyond a persons controlsupport the case for trying to make society more egalitarian? Arguments for luck egalitarianism are woefully incomplete unless they sufficiently address (1) the role of choice in shaping outcomes, (2) the difficulty of crafting policies that promote egalitarian goals, and (3) the likelihood that even well-crafted policies would not work out as envisioned.
Egalitarianism, Properly Conceived
We ALL Are Rawlsekians Now!
By Michael C. Munger
This
article
appeared in
the Summer 2017 issue of The Independent Review.
Other Independent Review articles by Michael C. Munger | ||
Summer 2022 | In Memoriam: Richard L. Stroup (19432021) | |
Summer 2022 | Markets Without Limits:How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate | |
Summer 2022 | The Prehistory of Private Property:Implications for Modern Political Theory | |
[View All (64)] |