Despite their numerous differences, British political theorist Michael Oakeshott and Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises held remarkably similar views on the nature of the social sciences. Comparing their presuppositions may help us uncover a common ground for theorizing about human action as well as illuminate their ideas from a new vantage point.
Oakeshott and Mises on Understanding Human Action
By Gene Callahan
This
article
appeared in
the Fall 2005 issue of The Independent Review.
Other Independent Review articles by Gene Callahan | ||
Winter 2008/09 | The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies | |
Summer 2008 | Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy | |
Fall 2005 | Michael Oakeshott: An Introduction | |
[View All (5)] |