Classical liberals haven’t adequately engaged with the intellectual challenge posed by East Asia and have instead resorted to the use of economic freedom statistics to portray these nations as market successes. They cannot account for East Asia’s unique state-market arrangements and the deliberate ways in which their governments reject market liberalism. We need in-depth case studies of East Asia. Austrian social economy offers a fruitful approach, as it points out the need to consider what people think and believe, opening the door to examinations of culture, values, and ethics in particular historical contexts.

This full text of this article will be available on this page nine months after its initial print publication. To read it now, please buy this issue in print or downloadable eBook & PDF format, or in the Independent Review app on iOS or Android, or on Magzter which offers digital access on smartphones, tablets, and web browsers.
AsiaInternational Economics and Development
Other Independent Review articles by Bryan Cheang
Spring 2024 Concepts before Measurement: A Rejoinder to Ryan Murphy on the Developmental State