Outlining the strategic nature of nonviolent action, and cataloguing an array of historical resistance to the state, Gene Sharp’s book has inspired social movements from the 1980s anticommunist uprisings through the 2010s’ Arab Spring and beyond. This paper situates The Politics of Nonviolent Action within the context of social movement theorization and shows that the empirical literature vindicates Sharp’s position that nonviolence is more effective than its violent counterpart in engendering societal change.

This full text of this article will be available on this page nine months after its initial print publication. To read it now, please buy this issue in print or downloadable eBook & PDF format, or in the Independent Review app on iOS or Android, or on Magzter which offers digital access on smartphones, tablets, and web browsers.
Mikayla Novak is a senior fellow in the F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, Mercatus Center at George Mason University.
Civil Liberties and Human RightsCrime, Criminal Justice, and PrisonsEuropeGovernment and PoliticsInternational Economics and DevelopmentLaw and LibertyNorth Africa and The Middle EastPolicingPolitical Theory
Other Independent Review articles by Mikayla Novak
Spring 2022 Land, the State, and War: Property Institutions and Political Order in Afghanistan