The “veil of ignorance,” at the heart of John Rawls’ theory of justice, is a conceptual breakthrough. But his interpretation of its implications is flawed: he has given us a theory of who deserves what that ceases to exist as soon as anyone can be said to deserve anything. Once one fixes a couple of bad connections so that claims of need and claims of desert get adjudicated together, a full theory of justice emerges and implies a complete overhaul of the welfare state.

This full text of this article will be available online nine months after its initial print publication. To read it now, please buy this issue in print or eBook format from our store, or in the new Independent Review app on iOS or Google Play, or on Magzter which offers digital access on smartphones, tablets, and web browsers.