The Misuse of Egalitarianism in Society
By James R. Otteson Jr.
Does the existence of brute luckchance events and circumstances that are beyond a persons controlsupport the case for trying to make society more egalitarian? Arguments for luck egalitarianism are woefully incomplete unless they sufficiently address (1) the role of choice in shaping outcomes, (2) the difficulty of crafting policies that promote egalitarian goals, and (3) the likelihood that even well-crafted policies would not work out as envisioned.
|Other Independent Review articles by James R. Otteson Jr.|
|Summer 2019||Opting Out:A Defense of Social Justice|
|Fall 2012||The Moral Foundation of Economic Behavior|
|Winter 2010/11||Why Not Socialism?|
|[View All (9)]|