Users have suspected Twitter of engaging in shadowbanning and suppressing the visibility of user accounts for years, even though the social media giant has adamantly denied the practice.
Yesterday (Dec 8 2022), using the information provided by Twitter under direction from new Chief Executive Elon Musk, journalist Bari Weiss, released a Twitter thread confirming these suspicions. Twitter secretly suppressed accounts, operated a search blacklist, and blocked certain content from trending, Weiss thread confirms. In response, Musk tweeted that Twitter plans to release software that will provide users with more clarity regarding shadowbanning.
Victims of Twitters practices include Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Stanford professor of medicine and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD). Weisss thread and The Twitter Files confirm what weve long suspected. Seeking to prop up Anthony Fauci and the lockdown policies he promoted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Twitter (and other Big Tech companies) intentionally blacklisted, censored, suppressed, and targeted the GBD and its signers.
Within Twitter, the Strategic Response TeamGlobal Escalation Team, or SRT-GET, worked on hundreds of cases daily, actively filtering the visibility of select accounts.
For high-profile accounts, the Site Integrity Policy, Policy Escalation Support, team, known as SIP-PES would secretly make censorship decisions. The SIP-PES team comprised high-profile executives such as the Head of Legal, Policy, and Trust, Vijaya Gadde, Global Head of Trust & Safety, Yoel Roth, and former CEOs Jack Dorsey and Parag Agrawal.
Weiss confirms with screenshots.
In addition to Weiss, Twitters new leadership granted journalist Matt Taibbi access to its files. Below, Taibbi illustrates how Twitter deleted tweets at the behest of the Biden Presidential campaign.
8. By 2020, requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine. One executive would write to another: More to review from the Biden team. The reply would come back: Handled. pic.twitter.com/mnv0YZI4af Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) December 2, 2022
Still unfolding in this investigation is the role of government officials in pressuring Twitter to engage in censorship over the COVID-19 pandemic. As revealed by a lawsuit earlier this year, internal company Slack messages show that Andy Slavitt, a former official on Joe Bidens pandemic task force, met with Twitter officials and pressured them to restrict the account of COVID gadfly Alex Berenson. Slavitt also , delivered an ominous warning to executives at Facebook that the company would find itself in the White Houses crosshairs if it did not step up its efforts to restrict what the task force deemed to be COVID misinformation.
We now have conclusive evidence that public officials pressure private companies to do the dirty work of censorship. We have yet to discover, and may never know, how far the political involvement in social media censorship went, and which officials were given the power to silence. An ongoing lawsuit by the Attorneys General of Missouri and Louisiana is currently seeking to get to the bottom of those questions. Just two weeks ago, they obtained a court-ordered deposition from Anthony Fauci, in which they grilled him over similar suppressive tactics. Fauci proved evasive, invoking the I dont recall line 174 times, but was caught in a lie about his direct personal involvement in the National Institutes of Healths (NIH) efforts to smear and discredit the GBDs authors as fringe epidemiologists.
GBD co-author Jay Bhattacharya was slapped with a secret Trends Blacklist tag by Twitter executives at some point after his account was created in September 2021, Weisss thread confirms. The blacklist tag effectively suppressed Bhattacharyas tweets by preventing them from going viral or being picked up by Twitters trends algorithm. By all appearances, one or more persons on the companys SIP-PES team made the decision to suppress scientifically grounded dissent against lockdowns.
3. Take, for example, Stanfords Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) who argued that Covid lockdowns would harm children. Twitter secretly placed him on a Trends Blacklist, which prevented his tweets from trending. pic.twitter.com/qTW22Zh691 Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
Given the history surrounding social media giants, government officials, and the GBD, Battacharyas shadowbanning is not surprising. Unfortunately, neither Weiss nor Taibiis thread indicates why Twitter took such actions against Dr. Battacharya, a respected Stanford Professor.
What we do know is that Twitters actions are consistent with other social media censorship of the declaration, its authors, and supporters. Posts referencing the GBD were removed from popular Reddit threads such as r/COVID-19 and r/Coronavirus, and large online communities with millions of members. Google also played a role. In the week after the GBDs release in October 2020, Googles news site search algorithms suppressed mainstream coverage of the document by outlets such as Fox News and the Wall Street Journal.
Instead, it steered news searches for Great Barrington Declaration toward anti-GBD hit pieces in fringe venues such as the Byline Times, a blog featuring 9/11 conspiracy theorist Nafeez Ahmed. Google algorithms reportedly prioritized an anti-GBD political editorial in Wired Magazine that Anthony Fauci also mined for his own anti-GBD talking points in the press.
These acts of censorship occurred at a time when government officials were working hard behind the scenes to discredit the GBD and its authors. Most notably, NIAID director Anthony Fauci and NIH director Francis Collins collaborated to wage a devastating published take down campaign against the GBD, labeling it nonsense or misinformation.
Fauci and Collins actions are public information in emails first discovered through a Freedom of Information Act inquiry from AIER last winter. The Fauci-Collins emails made national news and became the subject of a Senate hearing in January 2021, where Senator Rand Paul grilled the White Houses COVID advisor over his involvement in the take down order.
Last week, Anthony Fauci denied any involvement in coordinating attacks on the GBD under deposition by the Missouri Attorney General. He claims that he was too busy to do so. His emails reveal a different story, though. Fauci expressed his agreement with Collins directive, and colluded with Deborah Birx to preempt discussion of the GBD at a White House COVID task force meeting. At some point, Fauci even directed his Chief of Staff Greg Folkers to assemble a list of anti-GBD political editorials, evidently to be parrotted back to the news media during interviews about the GBD. We still dont know the full extent of Faucis efforts, because the NIH heavily redacted several pages of the requested records. But his involvement in the take down is undeniable.
Given the nature of Faucis smears, lies, and demeanor towards those who question his policy prescriptions, it is time to fully open up the public record at the NIH. It is time to scrutinize the decisions they made during COVID-19, including decisions to politicize science and suppress dissenting viewpoints.
We know that Twitter worked with the Biden campaign to suppress tweets. We know that top Biden administration officials pressured Twitter, Facebook, and presumably other companies to penalize dissenting viewpoints on COVID-19 policy, including lockdowns. We also know that Fauci, former White House Chief Medical Advisor, will leverage the media to undermine his perceived opponents and lie about it under oath. We know.
Private companies are free to censor user speech on their platforms, but when top government officials pressure them to take these actions, that crosses a different line.
Thanks to Musk releasing the Twitter files to Weiss and Taibbi, we have more insight into Twitters internal censorship policies. Unfortunately, until the NIH releases more information, the Twitter Files raise more questions than answers.