The Independent Institute The Independent Institute
div1 div2 div3
div div

PUBLICATIONS
Books
The Independent Review (Quarterly Journal)
Policy Reports
The Lighthouse
(E-mail Newsletter)
Commentary Articles
News Releases
Audio and Visual Programs
The Independent (Quarterly Newsletter)
Research Articles
Working Papers

Independent Institute

Text Adoption Program

Independent Institute

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube YouTube RSS RSS

Search
 Advanced Search

Independent Institute

Printer Friendly
Email to a Friend

The Lighthouse
Our weekly E-Mail Newsletter
 

Contribute
Your participation will advance liberty. Become an Independent Institute member.

Independent Institute

Contact Us
The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428

The Independent Institute
1319 18th St. NW
Washington, D.C. 20036

510-632-1366 Phone
510-568-6040 Fax
Send us email

Independent Institute
Interested in working with us?  Click here for more information.


The Independent Review
Volume 11 Number 4
Spring 2007


Chesterton and Belloc: A Critique
By Walter Block
Marcus Epstein

Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

Conservative heirs to the agrarian romantics, G. K. Chesterton and Hillaire Belloc believed the Industrial Revolution had made the English working class less secure because whereas small property holders had been able to live off the land during hard times, wage earners were dependent on their employers. Chesterton and Belloc advocated land reform and other “distributist” policies to resolve this predicament, but their proposals would have required state action on a scale that would have violated their own anti-socialist principles.




Copyright 2010 The Independent Institute