Historians who earn their keep by rating U.S. presidents tend to equate successful economic policies with big government. Rigorous assessments free of such bias would shed much-needed light on presidential successes and failures.
Read the Full Article
(PDF, 2 pages)
|Other Independent Review articles by Robert M. Whaples|
|Fall 2017||The One Hundredth Anniversary of the Russian Revolution|
|Fall 2017||A Pope and A President: John Paul II, Ronald Reagan, and the Extraordinary Untold Story of the Twentieth Century|
|Summer 2017||Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science|
|[View All (20)]|