Historians who earn their keep by rating U.S. presidents tend to equate successful economic policies with big government. Rigorous assessments free of such bias would shed much-needed light on presidential successes and failures.
Read the Full Article
(PDF, 2 pages)
|Other Independent Review articles by Robert M. Whaples|
|Spring 2017||The Language of Economics: Socially Constructed Vocabularies and Assumptions|
|Winter 2017||The Economics of Pope Francis: An Introduction|
|Fall 2016||Passing on the Right: Conservative Professors in the Progressive University|
|[View All (16)]|