Historians who earn their keep by rating U.S. presidents tend to equate successful economic policies with big government. Rigorous assessments free of such bias would shed much-needed light on presidential successes and failures.
|Other Independent Review articles by Robert M. Whaples|
|Summer 2014||The Bet: Paul Ehrlich, Julian Simon, and Our Gamble over Earths Future|
|Spring 2014||Were Andrew Jacksons Policies Good for the Economy?|
|Winter 2014||Ten Economic Lessons from The Treasure of the Sierra Madre|
|[View All (7)]|