Historians who earn their keep by rating U.S. presidents tend to equate successful economic policies with big government. Rigorous assessments free of such bias would shed much-needed light on presidential successes and failures.
Read the Full Article
(PDF, 2 pages)
|Other Independent Review articles by Robert M. Whaples|
|Summer 2017||Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science|
|Summer 2017||New Thinking on Egalitarianism|
|Spring 2017||The Language of Economics: Socially Constructed Vocabularies and Assumptions|
|[View All (18)]|