In the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, various armchair quarterbacks were quick to blame Houstons lack of zoning lawsrather than the 50 inches of rain that inundated the area for the unprecedented flooding.
Perhaps Hurricane Irmawhich just ripped through Floridawill help focus attention on a bigger reason the East and Gulf coasts are prone to widespread storm damage: the National Flood Insurance Program.
Truth be told, no amount of government zoning and urban planning could have prevented the flooding caused by Hurricane Harvey. But the damage might have been less widespread, in both the Texas Gulf and Florida, if the government didnt subsidize flood insurance, which encourages building in low-lying areas.
Houston is unique because its the largest U.S. city without traditional zoning laws limiting development. And development continues to boom, with a 23 percent increase in the population since the last record flood from tropical storm Allison in 2001.
Critics of Houstons laissez faire development model claim the additional buildings and pavement decrease the ability of the ground to absorb water, creating the runoff that caused the flooding. While additional pavement undoubtedly increases the amount of impervious surface, there is nothing unique about Houstons lack of zoning that made the flooding any worse than a government planned city would have experienced.
Houstons most fundamental flood problem is its extraordinarily flat topography. Most of its waterways are slow-moving creeks and bayous that wind their way through the city and eventually trickle into the shallow, marshy coastline of Galveston and Trinity Bays. During a deluge, drainage is slow, so these systems fill rapidly with water that effectively has nowhere to go.
These factors created a flood-prone city long before Houstons growth spurt. In fact, downtown Houston has suffered a major flood on average about once a decade as far back as records extend. One of the first such floods struck during a hurricane in 1837 and submerged what is now downtown Houston under four feet of water. A particularly catastrophic storm in December 1935 flooded most of the city and stands out for its similarities to the flood patterns of Harvey.
Houston was a much smaller city in 1935, both in population and geographical area. Water absorbing farmland covered much of what today are the citys sprawling suburbs. Yet, Buffalo Bayouthe main waterway through downtownpeaked at more than 54 feet. During Harvey, by comparison, it hit only 40 feet.
While Houston has grown significantly since 1935, the lack of zoning has not turned Houston into giant concrete water-retention pond. Among Americas 10 largest cities, Houston has the most total acres of parkland and green space. In fact, a 2011 study by the Houston-Galveston Area Council found that more than 90 percent of the citys land has low levels of impervious coverage relative to greenery and other water-absorbing surfaces.
Even though Houstons free-market approach to development has kept it affordable, many of the citys poorer residents were displaced by the recent flooding because the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which helps drive housing patterns, is not driven by market forces.
In effect, NFIP subsidizes the risk people assume by living on a flood plain or in an area prone to storm surge damage. According to a recent study some 15 percent to 20 percent of NFIP policy holders receive subsidies that reduce their premium costs by approximately 60 percent to 65 percent.
Although rates of purchasing flood insurance outside of Special Flood Hazard Zones have been dropping nationally and in Houston, the subsidy within these zones leads developers to build more houses in the flood plain, just as it encourages building in hurricane-prone areas of the East Coast.
Ironically, what this means is that its not the lack of regulation that exposed many of Harveys victims to catastrophic loss, it was government policy.
Though Houstons lack of zoning cant be blamed for the citys flooding problems, it can be part of the solution. With few regulatory impediments, rebuilding should happen more quickly than it might otherwise.
Due to the recent hurricanes, Congress will be under intense pressure to increase funding for the National Flood Insurance Program, which the White House had proposed reducing earlier this year. Instead, Congress should get rid of the program. It encourages bad choices, which produce bad results.
|Benjamin Powell is a Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute, Director of the Free Market Institute at Texas Tech University. He Independent Institute books include The Economics of Immigration: Market-Based Approaches, Social Science, and Public Policy, Housing America: Building out of Crisis, and Making Poor Nations Rich.|
|Phil Magness is a visiting assistant professor of economics at Berry College, Rome, GA.|
Few topics in current affairs are as contentious as immigration. Yet despite the controversies, social scientists who study immigration largely agree about its effects, whatever differences they may have about how a nation should change its policies. Their findings, however, have been buried in academic journals accessible only to other scholarsuntil now. Readers can now easily access the substance of the vast scholarly literature about a subject that touches millions of lives.