WASHINGTONSeveral Chinese readers have contacted me to express astonishment at the chorus of voices blaming China for the U.S. recession. They wonder: Is this the preamble of a protectionist backlash?
There is plenty that China deserves to be bashed forits political system and its backing of Sudan and Zimbabwe, for instancebut not the U.S. recession. Yet although it is hard to see how China-bashing would translate into protectionism when Washington needs Beijings financial help, one should never underestimate peoples capacity to self-inflict damage in times of panic. The buy American provision barring the use of foreign steel and iron in the economic stimulus package approved by the U.S. House of Representatives is a stark reminder.
China-bashers maintain that Beijing cheapened its exports through currency manipulation, encouraging Americans to devour them; the Chinese then invested part of that money and other savings in U.S. assets, prompting the drop in interest rates that in turn fueled the housing bubble. With variations, this view is shared by the previous and the current secretaries of the Treasury, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, some members of Congress, not to mention some well-known commentators. They claim that the U.S. has been spending too much because China has been saving too much (I kid you not!).
Yes, in the last 10 years the real personal saving rate in the U.S. has been close to zero (although it is now going up in the midst of the recession), while that of China has been somewhere between 30 percent and 40 percent. If we add government and corporate savings, Chinas rate has been close to 50 percent, almost five times that of the U.S.
But China has been saving much of its income since long before U.S. home prices skyrocketed, and it continues to save more than two years after the bubble burst. The idea that Chinas savings caused the low interest rates that pumped Americas housing bubble does not square with the fact that, according to the International Monetary Funds World Economic Outlook, the savings of the underdeveloped nations continued to rise between 2003 and 2007, when mortgage rates rose steadily in the U.S. after their ridiculously low years earlier in the decade.
As economist Robert Murphy, the author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism, maintains in an article, when American consumers went on a binge because they dreamed that their houses would appreciate forever, the worlds saving rate was actually lower than in the 1980s and much of the 90s.
The U.S. financial mess and the ensuing recession were home-grown. Whether one subscribes, as I do, to the view that the consumers frenzy and Wall Streets lunacy originated in the Federal Reserves policy of easy money and the lowering of lending standards or, as many others think, in financial deregulation, the key decisions were made by Americans who were (or seemed) perfectly awake. China did not set U.S. interest rates, increase the money supply and pass laws such as the updated Community Reinvestment Act or the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act. Andif one subscribes to the other viewChina is not the one that deregulated U.S. financial markets through laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999.
When a governmentas the Bush administration didengages in expensive foreign and domestic policies that feed on deficits and debt, and consumers decide to follow suit, you eventually run into trouble. The fact that another country decides to save half of its income and invest in the future should make Americans proud: The gospel of U.S. capitalism has finally spread to the unbelievers! Had it not been for Chinese, Japanese and British investors, the U.S. would have gone bankrupt. Given the amount of new debt that Washington is contemplating in order to rescue Americans from the smartest thing they have done in a long timesave some money and try to adjustChina-bashers should be aware that they will need foreign savers more than ever.
None of this means that Beijings economy is above reproach. For one, China increased the money supply irresponsibly and is now facing an economic slowdown that, as The Economist showed this week, is not primarily due to the drop in exports to the United States. But Washington should not blame the wrong culprit for its mistakes.
Instead, Americans should accept that the road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom only in William Blakes prose. In real life, the road to paradise is that of hard work, thrift and creative investment.
|Alvaro Vargas Llosa is Senior Fellow at The Center on Global Prosperity at the Independent Institute. He is a native of Peru and received his B.Sc. in international history from the London School of Economics. His Independent Institute books include Global Crossings: Immigration, Civilization, and America, Lessons From the Poor: Triumph of the Entrepreneurial Spirit, The Che Guevara Myth and the Future of Liberty, and Liberty for Latin America.|
(c) 2009, The Washington Post Writers Group
The erosion of national boundariesand even the idea of the nation stateis already underway as people become ever more inter-connected across borders. A jungle of myth, falsehood and misrepresentation dominates the debate over immigration. The reality is that the economic contributions of immigration far outweigh the costs.