Conservative heirs to the agrarian romantics, G. K. Chesterton and Hillaire Belloc believed the Industrial Revolution had made the English working class less secure because whereas small property holders had been able to live off the land during hard times, wage earners were dependent on their employers. Chesterton and Belloc advocated land reform and other distributist policies to resolve this predicament, but their proposals would have required state action on a scale that would have violated their own anti-socialist principles.
Chesterton and Belloc
A Critique
By Walter E. Block, Marcus Epstein, Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
This
article
appeared in
the Spring 2007 issue of The Independent Review.
EconomistsEconomyGovernment and PoliticsLaw and LibertyPhilosophy and ReligionPolitical HistoryPolitical Theory
Other Independent Review articles by Walter E. Block | |
Spring 2022 | The Ethics of Liberty |
Winter 2018/19 | Crony Capitalism versus Pure Capitalism |
Fall 2015 | A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History |
Other Independent Review articles by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. | |
Spring 2007 | The Victory of Reason: How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and Western Success |
Spring 2005 | The Christian Realists: Reassessing the Contributions of Niebuhr and His Contemporaries |