The quest for a stateless society is futile because the inevitable rule of the politically strong over the weak makes government also inevitable, argued Randall G. Holcombe in the Winter 2004 issue of The Independent Review. But the arguments Holcombe used to question the viability of libertarian anarchy can also be used to argue against the viability the limited government he favors, and the arguments he uses in favor of the viability of limited government also support the viability of anarchy.
|Other Independent Review articles by Peter T. Leeson|
|Spring 2007||The Use of Knowledge in Natural-Disaster Relief Management|
|Other Independent Review articles by Edward P. Stringham|
|Spring 2017||Hamiltons Legacy and the Great Man Theory of Financial History|
|Summer 2004||Commerce, Markets, and Peace: Richard Cobdens Enduring Lessons|
|Summer 2004||The Debates of Liberty: An Overview of Individualist Anarchism, 18811908|