Does the existence of brute luckchance events and circumstances that are beyond a persons controlsupport the case for trying to make society more egalitarian? Arguments for luck egalitarianism are woefully incomplete unless they sufficiently address (1) the role of choice in shaping outcomes, (2) the difficulty of crafting policies that promote egalitarian goals, and (3) the likelihood that even well-crafted policies would not work out as envisioned.
This article will be posted in full nine months after its initial print publication. To read it now, please download the issue via the Independent Review app (available on iOS, Kindle Fire and Android) for $2.99, or buy a print copy of this issue for $12.00.
|Other Independent Review articles by James R. Otteson Jr.|
|Fall 2012||The Moral Foundation of Economic Behavior|
|Winter 2011||Why Not Socialism?|
|Winter 2009||Kantian Individualism and Political Libertarianism|
|[View All (8)]|