Volume 20, Issue 12: March 20, 2018
- Become a Better-Informed Ambassador for Your Ideals
- Case for the Second Amendment
- President Trump, Pope Francis, and Immigration
- Californias New Hope for Housing Prices
- Join Independent Institute at FreedomFest
- Help Us Foster Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty
- Independent Updates
As a reader of The Lighthouse you probably see yourself as a goodwill ambassador for a more peaceful, prosperous, and free society. You diplomatically engage your family, friends, and communities on matters of timeless principles as well as the leading issues of the day, and you often use Independent Institutes material to help make your case. To help increase your influence, weve just overhauled and streamlined the Issues Directory on our website. Now it is easier than ever for you to discover the commentary, scholarly articles, book reviews, and other content you find most engagingenabling you to amplify your impact via social media, Letters to the Editor, and other grassroots efforts.
Our new issues directory organizes our more than three decades of intellectual output into 13 broad categorieseach one with an issue description, featured highlights, and numerous sub-categories to help you zero in on the kind of material youre looking for:
- Culture and Society
- Defense and Foreign Policy
- Energy and Environment
- Entitlements and Welfare
- Government and Politics
- International Economics and Development
- Law and Liberty
- Philosophy and Religion
- Taxes and Budget
Please dive in and let us know what you think, including any ideas you think might make it better!
In the wake of last months mass shooting at a Florida high school, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens called, yet again, for repealing the Second Amendment. Stephens argued that gun control has failed and that only full repeal could lead to the enactment of policies that might actually curb gun violence. In contrast, Independent Institute Research Fellow Stephen P. Halbrook, writing in the Washington Times, argues that a constitutional right to keep and bear arms does in fact reduce violencenamely, egregious assaults committed by a rapacious government against the people.
Halbrook asks us to consider the fate of countries that failed to enact a constitutional right to firearms. After Hitler came to power, the Nazis used gun registration records to confiscate firearms, first from the social democrats and other opposition parties and later from all Jewish gun owners. France during the Nazi occupation was also disarmed. In neither country did the people have constitutional guarantees to keep their guns.
The American people, Halbrook argues, have escaped brutal subjugation by the government in part because of the prescience of James Madison, often considered the chief architect of the U.S. Constitution. Madison drafted what became the Second Amendment, recognizing that the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed, Halbrook writes. It was part and parcel of other fundamental rights of a free people, from free speech to the ban on unreasonable searches and seizures.
Repeal the Second Amendment?, by Stephen P. Halbrook (The Washington Times, 2/28/18)
Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and Enemies of the State, by Stephen P. Halbrook
Forthcoming: Gun Control in Nazi-Occupied France: Tyranny and Resistance, by Stephen P. Halbrook
More on Gun Control
President Trump and Pope Francis stand on opposite sides of the issue when it comes to U.S. immigration policy. Could they ever become eager to strike a deal that would make all parties better off? They might if they were to consider the same data, according to Independent Institute Senior Fellow Lawrence J. McQuillan and Maryland Public Policy Institute Senior Analyst Hayeon Carol Park, joint authors of a chapter in Pope Francis and the Caring Society.
One study, for example, suggests that anti-immigrant populism originates mostly in resentment against taxpayer-funded perks for recent immigrants, according to McQuillan and Park in an op-ed for Investors Business Daily. Another study they cite estimates that low-skilled immigrant families on average receive $20,000 in net public benefits a year. If anti-immigrant sentiment primarily stems from welfare chauvinism, then it seems counterproductive to increase state Medicaid spending for undocumented, low-skilled immigrants, as some California lawmakers have proposed.
Rather than seeing the immigration issue as an insurmountable gap, the president and the pope couldat least in theorybuild a bridge to each others side. If Pope Francis wants welcoming policies toward immigrants, he should acknowledge the harm that government transfer programs cause and work to nurture voluntary charity, McQuillan and Park write. President Trump, who has yet to make a dent in the welfare state, should join him in that cause. That way the pope and the president could work together to help migrants and refugees.
How the Pope and President Could Work Together to Help Immigrants, by Lawrence J. McQuillan and Hayeon Carol Park (Investors Business Daily, 2/28/18)
Pope Francis and the Caring Society, edited by Robert M. Whaples
More on Immigration
Once considered the frontier of the American Dream, California, especially anywhere near the coast, is now infamous for its high and rising home prices. That little San Jose starter home that sold for half-a-million dollars in 2003, for example, now sells for almost double that price. Fortunately, a new state billSB 827could spur housing development by enabling the state government to circumvent local housing restrictions, explains Independent Institute Senior Fellow Benjamin Powell.
The new legislation might even deflate environmentalist opponents of more housing. Since SB 827 trumps zoning restrictions in areas near transit that already have housing, undeveloped land would be largely unaffected, Powell writes in an op-ed for the Orange County Register. Similarly, since the areas are near transit, concerns about pollution are minimized.
If it succeeds, SB 827 will eventually put home ownership within reach of many who are currently priced out of the market. It would not, however, bring down California home prices anywhere near the national average. To do so would require eliminating more red tape than even the sponsors of SB 827 are shooting for. Its not that land per se is in short supply. As Powell notes, Californias scarce resource is local government permission to build.
The Right Time for Housing Affordability in California, by Benjamin Powell (Orange County Register, 3/11/18)
Housing America: Building Out of a Crisis, edited by Randall G. Holcombe and Benjamin Powell
More on Housing
FreedomFest is the world's largest gathering of free minds, and Independent Institute is proud to announce our partnership as a Gold Sponsor at the upcoming July 11-14 conference in Las Vegas! FreedomFest features the brightest pro-liberty thought leaders from around the world, including panels and debates with Independent Institute fellows!
The Beacon: New Blog Posts
- The Two Types of Socio-economic Problems, by Robert Higgs
- Give Freedom a Chance, by Robert Higgs
- Some Thoughts on Arming Teachers, by Randall Holcombe
- Free Market Think Tanks, Persuasion, and Big Data, by Lawrence J. McQuillan
MyGovCost: New Blog Posts
- The U.S. Governments Spending Problem, by Craig Eyermann
- White-Coat Gun Grabbers Want More Money, by K. Lloyd Billingsley
- Bullet Train Rolls On to $98.1 Billion Overall Cost Estimate, by K. Lloyd Billingsley