Volume 11, Issue 50: December 14, 2009
- Climate-gate Reveals Inconvenient Truths
- How the U.S. Could Leave Afghanistan
- Supreme Court to Decide Potentially Far-Reaching Patent Case
- Spains Lost Opportunity Could Become a Headache
- This Week in The Beacon
The climate research email scandal has exposed a conspiracy among some scientists to spread alarmist views on climate change and to squelch the voices of opposing scientists. Independent Institute President David J. Theroux writes: With the revelations from what is now being called Climate-gate, many people are beginning to see a grand scam in which data were deliberately distorted; peer review was gamed by manipulating and stacking the process; critics were smeared, black-balled, de-funded and even fired; opposing papers were kept from publication; and politically savvy scientists worked in concert with journalists, politicians, bureaucrats and interest groups to deceive both opinion leaders and the public to further their agenda.
At another level, Climate-gate also reveals that climate change is as much a religious issue as a scientific one, according to Independent Institute Senior Fellow Robert H. Nelson, author of the forthcoming book The Holy Wars: Economic Religion vs. Environmental Religion in Contemporary America.
The scandal displays the classic elements of a religious crusade. There are climate dogmas, climate heretics, warnings of climate apocalypse, climate prohibitions and other features long associated with religion, writes Nelson. Leading scientists in the climate debate react to criticism as though they are being attacked by the forces of darkness. Anything, therefore, is permitted in defense of the good.
Counterinsurgency campaigns in foreign countries usually fail because the top decision-makers seldom understand the culture in which the insurgents operate. According to Ivan Eland, director of the Independent Institutes Center on Peace & Liberty, the few exceptions in the twentieth centuryU.S. military operations against rebels in the Philippines after the Spanish-American War, the British in Malaya in the 1950s, and the U.S. recently in Iraqhave one thing in common: the insurgencies became divided.
President Obama can use the tactic of division to his advantage, Eland argues. To do so requires recognizing that Afghanistans political institutions differ from what Americans would expect. For example, factions in Afghanistan that are loyal to the United States will likely cooperate only for as long as the U.S. continues to buy their alligance. The opposite is also true: elements of the Taliban could be paid off to switch sides. Buying off and dividing the Taliban would allow the United States to create some semblance of political stabilityif only temporarily.
President Obama then needs to rapidly take advantage of any lessening of violence, while using the cover of the temporary troop surge to rapidly withdraw from Afghanistan, writes Eland. Simply put, we need to pay off some of our opponents and head for the door.
The Empire Has No Clothes: U.S. Foreign Policy Exposed, by Ivan Eland
Opposing the Crusader State: Alternatives to Global Interventionism, edited by Robert Higgs and Carl P. Close
A case before the U.S. Supreme Court could result in sweeping changes regarding the protection of intellectual property. The wrong outcome in the case, Bilski and Warsaw v. Kappos, would discourage innovation and impede economic growth, according to Independent Institute Senior Fellow William F. Shughart II.
The one-size-fits-all protection afforded patent holdersusually 20 years after a patent application was filedshould be ended, Shughart argues. The U.S. Congress and the courts should grant patents of different lengths, depending on the expected commercial vitality of the creative work. Under Shugharts proposal, patents for computer software, for example, would have a much shorter life than patents for a pharmaceutical product.
Incentives matter, writes Shughart. Although there may be a passionate few who don't require payment for contributing to the common pool of knowledge, technological advancement will be much more rapid if an explicit economic payoff is available.
In a Wikipedia Age, Should All Ideas Be Free? by William F. Shughart II (Christian Science Monitor, 12/8/09)
Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk by James Bessen and Michael J. Meurer. Reviewed by Julio Cole (The Independent Review, Spring 2009)
Taxing Choice: The Predatory Politics of Fiscal Discrimination, edited by William F. Shughart II
Ceutaa Spanish city on the North African side of the Strait of Gibraltaris a fascinating example of how the policies of the European Union can hinder peoples efforts to realize their full potential. The city is ethnically and religiously diverse, reflecting its rich history, but today it is perhaps best known for its military barracks and immigration containment, according to Independent Institute Senior Fellow Alvaro Vargas Llosa.
Ceuta lost its free-port status after Spain joined the European Union in 1986. Trade restrictions are now overbearing, prompting many Ceutans to make ends meet by dealing illegal drugs. Madrid could press the EU to eliminate the trade restrictions, but its Socialist government wishes to avoid offending Morocco, which has claimed Ceuta since the 1950s. Unless economic liberalization comes to Ceuta, however, growing resentments could stoke cultural and religious strife. Although Ceutas Muslims40 percent of the populationhave not been radicalized, that could change if legitimate economic opportunities remain elusive.
Ceutans are screaming for a chance to prosper and for as little politicking as possible, Vargas Llosa writes in his latest column. Madrid and Brussels should take notice.
Liberty for Latin America: How to Undo Five Hundred Years of State Oppression, by Alvaro Vargas Llosa
The Che Guevara Myth and the Future of Liberty, by Alvaro Vargas Llosa
Lessons from the Poor: The Triumph of the Entrepreneurial Spirit, edited by Alvaro Vargas Llosa
- Paul A. Samuelson, 1915-2009, by Robert Higgs (12/14/09)
- Not-So-Silent: Coolidge and Civil Rights, by Jonathan Bean (12/13/09)
- Lord Monckton and Greenpeace Campaigner at U.N. Copenhagen Conference, by David Theroux (12/13/09)
- More on Climategate and the Alarmist Hoax, by David Theroux (12/13/09)
- Are They Nuts? Oh Wait, It is the United Nations! by Jonathan Bean (12/12/09)
- The Federal Bureaucracy-Plutocracy, by Robert Higgs (12/12/09)
- Shattered Dreams, by Randall Holcombe (12/11/09)
- The Trick to Hide the Decline, by Mary Theroux (12/11/09)
- Boeing and the Higgs Effect, by Peter Klein (12/9/09)
- The Auto Bailout One Year Later: Was It Necessary? Did It Work? by Randall Holcombe (12/8/09)