Twenty percent of Californians lack health insurance. This fact is not a failure of a free market in medical care. Its a product of government interventions that drive up the cost of care and leave many Californians without the incentive or the ability to purchase insurance. To fix the problem fewer government regulations and interventions are needed, not more, as Governor Schwarzenegger has proposed.
The governors proposal requires all Californians to have health insurance and would force employers with ten or more employees to provide it or pay the state a tax so that the government can provide the insurance. He also proposes taxing hospitals and doctors to expand Medi-Cal, requiring insurers to issue policies to everyone regardless of their health and forbidding charging different premiums based on health or age.
To assess the governors plan, a fundamental question must first be askedwhy are there 6.5 million uninsured Californians? This statistic causes many to envision poor people who are perpetually uninsured. However, since employers often provide health insurance, many of the uninsured are between jobs and will soon be reinsured by a new employer. A 2003 Congressional Budget Office study found that of uninsured people nationwide at any one time, 45 percent of them get insured within four months. The California Medical Association found that 30 percent of uninsured Californians have family incomes over $50,000. Many of these families could afford insurance but choose not to buy it.
More government involvement in health care is not necessary to extend insurance to many of the uninsured. Reforms that equalize the tax treatment of individually purchased insurance and employer provided insurance would help alleviate the temporarily uninsured since more people would not have their insurance tied to their employer. At the national level President Bush has proposed a move in this direction by including employer provided insurance as income but allowing everyone who gets health insurance, whether individually or through their employer, to deduct $15,000 from their income when computing taxes.
To help more poor people afford health insurance, and to entice the uninsured who can afford it to buy insurance, Schwarzenegger should focus on making insurance less expensive. State regulations that mandate specific coverage of various treatments such as alcohol and drug abuse treatment, chiropractic treatment, and invitro fertilization, drive up the cost of health insurance. These and many other requirements all drive up the cost of health care by eliminating peoples ability to choose to purchase inexpensive bare bones coverage that would insure only against major accidents and illnesses. In Connecticut, one of the least regulated states, a 35-year-old male can get coverage for as little as $50 a month or $600 per year.
The governor claims his proposal will not, on net, cost anything, because by eliminating the uninsured they will no longer deprive hospitals of revenue and drive up the costs of the insured. Yet the Council for Affordable Health Insurance estimates that the cost of care for the uninsured is just 2.5 percent of health expenditures nationwide. Even if the cost of the uninsured in California is double the national average, Schwarzenegger proposes to use a chain saw to fix a problem that requires a scalpel.
Deregulation would fix some of Californias health care problems without the draconian requirements Schwarzenegger proposes. Laws should be changed to allow health insurance entrepreneurs greater freedom to experiment more with the types of coverage they offer, such as offering coverages like bare bones, full, or any combination in between. Changing the tax treatment of individually purchased insurance policies could help limit the problem of the temporarily uninsured. For the few who still couldnt afford insurance, medical charities should be encouraged to step in and help.
The American health care industry suffers from government regulations that limit entry through occupational licensure, and interferes with drug adoption and many other aspects of health care in addition to the health insurance market. Increasing reliance on markets in insurance will help to bring health care costs under control and within the reach of more Californians, but more comprehensive reforms should try to instill greater reliance on free markets in other aspects of health care as well.
|Benjamin Powell is a Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute, Director of the Free Market Institute at Texas Tech University, and former President of the Association of Private Enterprise Education. Dr. Powell received his Ph.D. in economics from George Mason University. He has been Assistant Professor of Economics at San Jose State University, Associate Professor of Economics at Suffolk University, a Fellow with the Mercatus Center's Global Prosperity Initiative, and a Visiting Research Fellow with the American Institute for Economic Research. He is also the editor of the Independent Institute books, Housing America: Building out of Crisis and Making Poor Nations Rich.|
HOUSING AMERICA: Building Out of a Crisis
Could government's pervasive involvement in housing be related to the very real problems of affordability, availability, mortgage defaults and loans, and much more? If so, the appropriate policy response would be to significantly reduce, not increase, government involvement. In reassessing government housing measures, Housing America: Building Out of a Crisis is the authoritative and most comprehensive book available on resolving the housing crisis.