NEWSROOM
Commentary Articles
In The News
News Releases
Experts



Media Inquiries

Kim Cloidt
Director of Marketing & Communications
(510) 632-1366 x116
(202) 725-7722 (cell)
Send Email

Robert Ade
Communications Manager
(510) 632-1366 x114
Send Email


Subscribe



Commentary
Facebook Facebook Facebook Facebook

Contribute
Your participation will advance liberty. Join us as an Independent Institute member.



Contact Us
The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428

510-632-1366 Phone
510-568-6040 Fax
Send us email


Interested in working with us?  Click here for more information.

News Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 4, 2007

Protecting U.S. Oil Interests?
Why Military Force Can’t Secure Cheaper Oil


OAKLAND, Calif., Sept. 4, 2007—With an increasing need for oil, what must the United States do to ensure that future supplies continue to meet demand? Is it reasonable to fear that a hostile foreign oil producer in Latin America or the Middle East will be able to damage America by withholding oil? The Left urges less consumption, the Right advocates Arctic drilling, and both seem to think that the only alternative would be war.

In his new Independent Policy Report, Do We Need to Go to War for Oil? (September 2007 / The Independent Institute), Independent Institute Research Fellow David Henderson argues “there is no good case for going to war for oil.” Whatever President Bush’s motivations for war in Iraq, attempts to secure oil through military force conflict with economic laws.

“Many people believe that foreign oil producers who export large quantities of oil can compel U.S. consumers to line up for gasoline,” says Henderson. “While this belief became popular in the 1970s after OPEC reduced supply, it is false.” Only American-imposed price controls can have this effect.

Henderson explains that the fear of “selective embargoes” demonstrates “a fundamental misunderstanding of how energy markets work.” If, for example, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez reduced his exports to the United States, he would have to find new buyers or scale back production to the detriment of Venezuela’s economy. If he sold his oil elsewhere, it would simply free up another supplier’s product, making it available to the United States.

War for oil is unnecessary in a world market. Even if it were a feasible strategy, Henderson shows that the costs would quickly exceed the benefits.

# # #



Home | About Us | Blogs | Issues | Newsroom | Multimedia | Events | Publications | Centers | Students | Store | Donate

Product Catalog | RSS | Jobs | Course Adoption | Links | Privacy Policy | Site Map
Facebook Facebook Facebook Facebook
Copyright 2014 The Independent Institute