NEWSROOM
Commentary Articles
In The News
News Releases
Experts



Media Inquiries

Kim Cloidt
Director of Marketing & Communications
(510) 632-1366 x116
(202) 725-7722 (cell)
Send Email

Robert Ade
Communications Manager
(510) 632-1366 x114
Send Email


Subscribe



Commentary
Facebook Facebook Facebook Facebook

Contribute
Your participation will advance liberty. Join us as an Independent Institute member.



Contact Us
The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428

510-632-1366 Phone
510-568-6040 Fax
Send us email


Interested in working with us?  Click here for more information.

News Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 1, 2001

Federalization vs. Airport Security: “Fanatic” Answers Krugman
New York Times “Big City” Writer John Tierney Quotes Institute Senior Fellow Robert Higgs in Latest Column

Oakland, CA—Are opponents of federalizing airport security uncritical “fanatics,” as New York Times writer and economist Paul Krugman describes them in his October 10th “Reckonings” column?

Not according to economic historian Dr. Robert Higgs, senior fellow at The Independent Institute, who was quoted extensively by New York Times writer John Tierney in his October 16th “The Big City” column.

“Airport security,” said Dr. Higgs, “would seem to be a task that demands the kind of local knowledge and particular expertise that a federal one-size-fits-all system would lack.”

“Nor would a federal administrator have the same incentive to do a good job,” Higgs added. “If a local airport-security manager fails, everyone knows whom to hold accountable. If a federal administrator should fail in one or two major cases, in contrast, he can always claim to have done a good job because ‘the system worked for 99 percent of airports.’” “Our history shows that once a job is federalized, it’s very hard to change,” Dr. Higgs observed. “Newly entrenched interests press for the retention of certain crisis policies, and the government always continues to exercise some of the new or expanded powers.”

“You’d think we’d be considering alternatives to the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. after their massive failure to anticipate the events of Sept. 11, but the public can’t even imagine a good alternative. At the very least, heads should be rolling at these agencies, but no one ever seems to be held accountable.”

-30-



Home | About Us | Blogs | Issues | Newsroom | Multimedia | Events | Publications | Centers | Students | Store | Donate

Product Catalog | RSS | Jobs | Course Adoption | Links | Privacy Policy | Site Map
Facebook Facebook Facebook Facebook
Copyright 2014 The Independent Institute