Earth Day, the environmentalist holy day, is approaching again, reminding us that environmentalism has become a kind of religion. Which raises a question: Why is it OK to teach environmental religion in public schools, while the teaching of Judaism, Christianity, and other traditional religions is not constitutionally permitted?
As Joel Garreau, a former Washington Post editor, wrote in 2010, faith-based environmentalism increasingly sports saints, sins, prophets, predictions, heretics, sacraments and rituals.
Some argue that a religion must have a God, which would disqualify environmentalism. Yet, as the great American psychologist and philosopher William James observed in The Varieties of Religious Experience, it is not necessary to positively assume a God to have a religion. James insisted that godless or quasi-godless creeds also can qualify as religions, whichgiven its devout belief system and the fervor of its adherentsclearly would include todays environmentalism.
Similarly, Paul Tillich, the great American theologian, defined religion as a comprehensive belief system that seeks to answer questions of ultimate concern to human existence. For Tillich, it was characteristic of our time that the most important religious movements are developing outside of [official] religion.
The Supreme Court endorsed such an understanding of religion in the 1965 case United States v. Seeger. The court ruled that conscientious-objector exemptions from the draft should be applied equally to those who believe in a supreme being and those with a sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God of religious believers.
Even as it adopts secular forms, environmentalism borrows to a surprising degree from Jewish and Christian history. For example, Deuteronomy warns those who worship false idols that God will send disease among you...fever, infections, plague, and war...[and] will blight your crops. In 2010, Al Gore similarly saw environmental sinners as headed for calamity on a biblical scale: rising seas, stronger and more destructive hurricanes, and longer and deeper droughts.
Contemporary environmentalisms greatest religious debt is owed to Calvinism. It was John Calvin who wrote that God had revealed himself and daily discloses himself in the whole workmanship of the universe. For both Calvin and environmentalism, the natural world is the work of God, the creation.
Mans role is to conserve Gods work. Thus, the rituals of environmentalism celebrate reduced consumptionlowering the heat, driving less, conserving water, living in smaller houses, having fewer children. Limiting human appetites, rather than satisfying ever-growing demands, is the environmental commandment.
As prominent an environmentalist as David Brower, who served as executive director of the Sierra Club for 18 years, has described human existence as a terrible cancer destroying Gods good creation. Being environmentally born again was for Brower and many other environmentalists the only good answer to modern mans environmental corruption and sinfulness.
The issue posed by environmentalism today, for those who believe in the separation of church and state, is: Does it make sense to constitutionally prohibit the teaching and embrace of Judaism, Protestantism, and the like in official public settings, while permitting the government establishmentas taught in the public schoolsof this new secularized faith: the religion of green, the religion of Earth Day.
Robert H. Nelson is a professor of environmental policy at the University of Maryland and a senior fellow with the Independent Institute. He is the author of The New Holy Wars: Economic Religion Versus Environmental Religion in Contemporary America.
|Robert H. Nelson is a Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute and author of the latest book, The New Holy Wars: Economic Religion vs. Environmental Religion in Contemporary America. He is also of Environmental Policy in the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland. He received his Ph.D. in economics from Princeton University, and he has been Staff Economist for the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs; Visiting Senior Fellow, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; Member of Economics Staff, Office of Policy Analysis, U.S. Department of the Interior; Federal Executive Fellow at the Brookings Institution; Chairman of Interior Department Task Force on Indian Economic Development; and Staff Economist, Twentieth Century Fund.|
THE NEW HOLY WARS: Economic Religion vs. Environmental Religion in Contemporary America
Economics and environmentalism are types of modern religions. So says this analysis of the roots of economics and environmentalism and their mutually antagonistic relations in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Questions about the proper relationship between human beings and nature have led to the growth of these public theologies, or secular religions, even while both avoid mentioning their derivation from Western Judeo-Christian sources. So while environmentalists regard human actions to warm the climate, expand human populations, and increase economic growth as immoral challenges to the natural order, economists seek to put all of nature to maximum use for the production of more goods and services and other human benefits.