WASHINGTONPresident Obamas visit to Chile, Brazil and El Salvador next week should not raise hopes about a grandiose outcome. The regions positive dynamicthe explosion of the middle class and the marginalization of the extreme leftis one on which the United States has had little bearing. The negative one, i.e., the violence related to the drug war, partly derives from a U.S. policy that will take years to change.
Latin America and the Caribbean have a long way to go: Only Chile and Barbados are ranked among the 50 most competitive economies. Its universities graduate six social scientists for every two engineers. And the money flooding Latin America today stems partly from Chinese demand for its commodities. But there has been a leap forward due to investment and trade. Poverty has dropped to one-third of the population30 million Brazilians joined the middle class in the last eight yearsand the economies of Peru, Colombia and Panama are booming, while Chiles is back up after its earthquake.
The last time the U.S. engaged the region in a common vision was the Free Trade Area of the Americas. Once that failed, Washington lost interest. In some respects, economic growth has taken place despite U.S. policy. Six major Brazilian exports face protectionist obstacles in the U.S. market, and Congress never ratified the Colombian Free Trade Agreement signed almost five years ago. Progress is mostly owed to a widespread political consensus in favor of market democracies. As reformed former Salvadorean guerrilla Joaquin Villalobos has said, Natural resources, external aid, free trade agreements and loans dont have the effect of political maturity.
A byproduct of this consensus has been the waning influence of the leftists of Cuba and Venezuela, supported by Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua. One of Obamas hosts, El Salvadors Mauricio Funes, has trumped efforts by his party, the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front, to allign the country with Venezuela, while Uruguays Jose Mujica, a former guerrilla, is now a grandfatherly social-democrat. Even Paraguays Fernando Lugo, who once flirted with the revolutionary coven, is now luring foreign capital.
Hugo Chavez is struggling with a chronic debacle. His main South American ally, Bolivias Evo Morales, is now loathed by two-thirds of his country, according to opinion polls. Nicaraguas Daniel Ortega is trying to get himself re-elected despite a constitutional ban, but that is partly a courtesy of the divided opposition.
Again, the shrinking of the loony leftultimately more transcendent for the future of Latin America than the economic takeoffowes little to U.S. influence.
The other side of the coin is the law-and-order drama fueled by the drug war. Here U.S. policy is a factor. Under pressure from Washington, coca cultivation shifted from Peru and Bolivia to Colombia in the 1990s. When Colombia turned the screws, it shifted back to Peru, where the area under cultivation has inceased by 70 percent and production has trippled. The same game of musical chairs is apparent with regard to trade routes. When the U.S. shut off the Caribbean corridor, Mexico replaced it. After thousands of people were killed in Mexico, some cartelssurprise, surprisemoved south, wreaking havoc in Guatemala, where the rate of violence is four times that of Mexico, and Honduras, where the rate is even worse.
Even though several American states allow medical marijuana and personal consumption is no longer heavily persecuted in the U.S., Washingtons drug policy in Latin America has not changed one bit. Calls by a wide spectrum of Latin American political and intellectual figures as well as major institutions to ditch the repressive approach have fallen on deaf ears. Three former presidentsBrazils Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Mexicos Ernesto Zedillo and Colombias Cesar Gaviriaissued a thoughtful appeal in 2009 to no avail.
The result is a nightmare taking place in countries where the flow of arms coming from the U.S. is endless. (Mexico has confiscated more than 100,000 automatic weapons over the last five years that came from across the border.) Demand for drugs in the United States, meanwhile, has remained stable and prices have dropped because of the unstoppable supply.
Obama probably knows it but does not have the stomach, at this point, for the protracted fight that a change in drug policy would entail. And until it happens, as Mexicos Felipe Calderon recently told me, it is unrealistic to expect any serious Latin American country to defy Washington on its own.
|Alvaro Vargas Llosa is Senior Fellow at The Center on Global Prosperity at the Independent Institute. He is a native of Peru and received his B.Sc. in international history from the London School of Economics. His Independent Institute books include Global Crossings: Immigration, Civilization, and America, Lessons From the Poor: Triumph of the Entrepreneurial Spirit, The Che Guevara Myth and the Future of Liberty, and Liberty for Latin America.|
The erosion of national boundariesand even the idea of the nation stateis already underway as people become ever more inter-connected across borders. A jungle of myth, falsehood and misrepresentation dominates the debate over immigration. The reality is that the economic contributions of immigration far outweigh the costs.