Although the economy is showing some signs of revival, many people wonder why it hasnt roared back, as it did after most previous contractions.
If consumer spending were the key, the economy would be going strong. Real consumer spending peaked in the fourth quarter of 2007, fell slightly (about 2.5%) over the next six quarters, and by the fourth quarter of 2010 exceeded its previous peak by almost 1%. So it is clear that a collapse in consumption is not to blame for the economys anemic recovery.
What is to blame is the collapse of private business investment. Until this critical component of the economytechnically, private domestic business net investmentfully recovers, the economy will continue to sputter.
Dont confuse net investment with gross investment.
Gross investment includes expenditures aimed merely at maintaining or replacing existing structures, tools and equipment, software and other capital goods as they become obsolete or wear out.
But unless firms do more than make up for depreciation, they do not expand their productive capacity, except to the extent that they replace worn-out or obsolete capital goods with models that employ improved technology. If all we do is replace a worn-out machine tool with a new one, we have not increased the number of machine tools.
Economic growth requires net investmentinvestment above and beyond the replacement leveland more rapid economic growth requires a greater rate of increase in such investment.
With that in mind, consider what has happened to net private investment.
Net private investment reached its recent cyclical peak in the third quarter of 2007, when firms were investing at a net annual rate of $463 billion per year. (In that same quarter, gross business investment was running at a $1.66 trillion annual rate.)
Net investment then fell steadily for the next four quarters, reaching $336 billion in the third quarter of 2008 and plummeting to $159 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008, a 53% drop in a single three-month period.
Although the financial-market panic that flared up in September 2008 began to subside early in 2009, net investment continued to fall, going into negative territory (minus $53 billion annually) in the first quarter of 2009 and falling further to minus $119 billion in the second quarter of 2009.
Some improvement began in the next quarter, but for the entire year 2009, net business investment amounted to minus $69 billion. Hardly by coincidence, U.S. gross domestic product also fell substantially in 2009.
Last year, net private investment increased significantly during the first nine months of the year, reaching an annual rate of $270 billion in the July-September quarter. It then contracted sharplyby almost 47%to $144 billion in the fourth quarter. For the entire year, the amount of private business net investment was only $177 billion.
Whether the collapse in the final quarter was a fluke or the beginning of a longer-term decline, we shall have to wait to see.
The critical point is that private net investment is currently occurring at a rate too low to sustain rapid economic growth. In the most recent quarter, October-December 2010, it was still less than a third of its 2007 peak rate. For the entire year 2010, it was down 60% from its peak.
Unless private investment recovers more rapidly, the economys recovery is sure to remain slow, too slow to significantly lower unemployment.
Firms are reluctant to undertake risky long-term investments because they continue to view the future with major misgivings, owing to the unsettled condition of future government actions with regard to health care, financial regulations, energy regulations, taxation and other matters that have serious business implications.
Although ObamaCare and the Dodd-Frank financial reforms were approved by Congress and signed into law last year, these massive statutes leave scores of important details awaiting determination by administrative agencies and courts. This doesnt create a climate conducive to aggressive investment.
A substantial, rapid recovery of net private business investment probably wont occur until the made-in-Washington clouds clear. Meanwhile, overall economic prospects will remain gloomy.
|Robert Higgs is a Senior Fellow in Political Economy at the Independent Institute and Editor at Large of the Institutes quarterly journal The Independent Review. He received his Ph.D. in economics from Johns Hopkins University, and he has taught at the University of Washington, Lafayette College, Seattle University, the University of Economics, Prague, and George Mason University.|
CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN (25TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION): Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government
The size and scope of government power has grown in response to crises of war and economic upheavals. Such increased power remains long after each crisis passes, threatening both civil and economic liberties, all at the behest of special interest groups.