WASHINGTONThere was no coup attempt in Ecuador a few days ago. There was an ill-advised, violent protest by the police against a law that cuts their benefits. President Rafael Correa farcically presented himself as a victim of a premeditated attempt to overthrow his rule. The result will be a perfect opportunity to consolidate his semi-authoritarian regime.
The background to the crisis is Correas fiscal mess. The budget deficitamounting to almost 5 percent of the countrys gross domestic productis a consequence of irresponsible policies by a president who is a member of Venezuelan Hugo Chavezs political coven. This includes a doubling of public spending, defaulting on more than $3.2 billion of foreign debt in 2008 and scaring off investment dollars with revolutionary hostilitythereby drying up various sources of revenue.
Ecuador, where oil production is falling fast, generates less crude than Venezuela, so Correa is desperate to obtain funding elsewhere. In the run-up to the crisis, he asked the National Assembly to pass laws aimed at squeezing certain sectors of the state in order to boost others. Some proposals generated resistance even from his supporters, including one that would raise the amount of debt the government could incur and another that would have the banks buying government bonds with their reserves. Those laws have not yet been approved. The bill that was approved after incorporating the presidents objections to a previous versionthe public services lawwould, among other things, limit the benefits of the security forces. Hence the police protest.
The police unquestionably acted with insubordination, leaving the streets unguarded and taking over their bases. Instead of giving them an ultimatum and subsequently ordering the armed forces to seize control, Correa went to the main barracks, the Regimiento Quito 1, to confront the protesters, clownishly opening his shirt and daring them to kill him. Inevitably, tempers were raised; the protesters became dangerous, throwing tear gas at Correa.
At no point did the armed forces seek to depose him or signal that they wanted him removed (even the chief of police asked the protesters to subordinate themselves to the president). The air force did close off the main airport, but the unequivocal support given to the president by the top ranks of the military, including army chief Ernesto Gonzalez, indicates this was not a political gesture. By all accounts, only a small number of low-ranking soldiers sympathized with the police. No mainstream political party or civilian organization moved a finger to have Correa removed when the president, affected by the tear gas, checked himself into the police hospital. Only the radical left-wing group Pachakutik called for his resignation.
Once in the hospital, Correa was able to welcome supporters, issue orders to members of his government, talk extensively with foreign dignitaries, give interviews and repeatedly taunt the protesters, daring them to kill him. The police, in obvious violation of the law, would not let him leave unless he accepted their demandswhich by now included amnesty for their rebellion, of course. The armed forces subsequently restored order and the rest is history.
This is not to say that Ecuadors democracy is stable. It is under perennial threat from ideologically motivated groups that toppled Correas three predecessors. But it is also under threat from Correa himself. Following the Venezuelan script, soon after he was elected in 2007, he called elections for a constituent assembly and illegally dissolved Congress, replacing it with the new assembly. This body, packed with Correa supporters, drew an a la carte constitution that opened the door for the president to seek re-election and begin what will likely be a long rule. Exactly what took place in Venezuela and Bolivia, and what Daniel Ortega is in the process of doing in Nicaragua.
As we saw in Honduras last year, where a populist president caused a constitutional crisis by illegally trying to seek re-election, the Bolivarian Alliance of populists is the primary source of political instability in Latin America today. Stable governments of the center-right or the center-left have not initiated self-coups or sparked off attempts to overthrow them. Only those countries where elected presidents subverted the rules from within have triggered major political violence.
The fact that governments across the hemisphere gullibly, though understandably, reacted as if there had been a coup attempt in Ecuador indicates to what extent they expect chaos from the countries of the Chavez axis.
|Alvaro Vargas Llosa is Senior Fellow at The Center on Global Prosperity at the Independent Institute. He is a native of Peru and received his B.Sc. in international history from the London School of Economics. His Independent Institute books include Global Crossings: Immigration, Civilization, and America, Lessons From the Poor: Triumph of the Entrepreneurial Spirit, The Che Guevara Myth and the Future of Liberty, and Liberty for Latin America.|
The erosion of national boundariesand even the idea of the nation stateis already underway as people become ever more inter-connected across borders. A jungle of myth, falsehood and misrepresentation dominates the debate over immigration. The reality is that the economic contributions of immigration far outweigh the costs.