Today is the United States Bill of Rights Day, but District of Columbia residents are second-class citizens when it comes to the Second Amendment. President-elect Barack Obama certainly does not support it. When I filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court supporting the respondent in District of Columbia v. Heller on behalf of 55 senators, the senate president, and 250 representatives, Obama declined. And his voting record in the Illinois legislature and the U.S. Congress has been as hostile to American gun owners as King George III was in 1775. Whats in store for Second Amendment rights come January?
Imagine that at Lexington and Concord, British Major John Pitcairn does not shout Disperse you RebelsDamn you, throw down your Arms and disperse! . . . and that the shot heard round the world is not fired. Imagine that instead he reads to the assembled colonists the following decree by British Commander-in-Chief General Thomas Gage, modeled of course after the newly minted 2008 District of Columbia gun law:
- Bans assault weapons, defined by a long list of various rifles, pistols, and shotguns, and concludes with the catch-all: Any firearm that the Chief may designate as an assault weapon by rule. Anyone who disobeys will be imprisoned.
- Requires all non-banned firearms to be registered with the Chief, who promises never to confiscate themunless you forget to register or re-register them, that isand registration certificates shall expire three years after the date of issuance unless renewed.
- A non-banned pistol can be registered but only for use in self-defense within that persons home. You cannot defend yourself outside the home. The Chief shall require any registered pistol to be submitted for a ballistics identification procedure and shall establish a reasonable fee for such procedure. Oh, and only one pistol can be registered in a thirty-day period.
- Within two years1777 for the colonists, 2010 for D.C. residentsyou will go to prison if you have a pistol that is not microstamp ready or is an unsafe pistol as determined by weirdoes in the futuristic state of California.
- Knapsacks with more than ten rounds of ammunition are banned as large capacity ammunition feeding devices. Essentially, you will be arrested if you have eleven or more rounds.
Of course the Chief is the Chief of Police, and these quotes came directly from the new law. Imagine that the colonists reverently surrendered their assault weapons and sought to register their non-banned arms and pay the Chief his reasonable fee. Imagine that our founders were sheepish wimps who remained subservient to royal tyranny instead of demanding the American Revolution. Imagine that two centuries later we delegated all power to the California legislature and that in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), D.C. won instead of lost.
Thankfully, that was not the case. The Supreme Court ruled against D.C. and held its handgun ban to be in violation of the Second Amendments right of the people to keep and bear arms. But with Obamas recent appointment of Eric Holder as his attorney general and D.C.s determination to leave its citizens helpless against the criminals the police cant control, history shows you cant hold your breath waiting for others to protect your rights. It seems the colonists at Lexington and Concord had it right.
GUN CONTROL IN THE THIRD REICH: Disarming the Jews and Enemies of the State
Presents the definitive history of how the Nazi regime used gun control to disarm and repress its enemies and consolidate power. Previous books on Nazi Germany and the Holocaust fail even to mention the laws restricting firearms ownership, which rendered Jews, political opponents, and other disfavored groups defenseless.