NEWSROOM
Commentary Articles
In The News
News Releases
Experts



Media Inquiries

Kim Cloidt
Director of Marketing & Communications
(510) 632-1366 x116
(202) 725-7722 (cell)
Send Email

Robert Ade
Communications Manager
(510) 632-1366 x114
Send Email


Subscribe



Commentary
Facebook Facebook Facebook Facebook

Contribute
Your participation will advance liberty. Join us as an Independent Institute member.



Contact Us
The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428

510-632-1366 Phone
510-568-6040 Fax
Send us email


Interested in working with us?  Click here for more information.

Commentary

Blockades, Embargoes and Lies


     
 Print 

The 15th Ibero-American Summit, held in Salamanca, Spain, some days ago, was characterized by its empty declarations against poverty, its support of aid to the victims of natural disasters and, of course, its excellent banquets.

There’s nothing new in this outcome, which is repeated with regularity year after year, while large numbers of journalists gather in search of some interesting news item that might go beyond the ritual words and the traditional photographs.

This time, as many times in the past, the only real news was provided on the topic by Cuba, where the most prolonged dictatorship in the world still holds sway.

The Cuban delegation achieved two diplomatic results that might well leave it satisfied. The first was a declaration against terrorism that alluded indirectly to the case of Luis Posada Carriles, the purported author of a terrorist attack that occurred almost three decades ago.

The representatives of the Cuban government want Posada, who was acquitted in two trials to which the Venezuelans subjected him, to be tried again in Venezuela now that President Hugo Chávez’s judicial system guarantees them an implacable sentence for an act that, according to law, has already been tried and thoroughly dealt with.

But that wasn’t the greatest triumph of Fidel Castro’s followers. Their main success was a call to the United States to put an end to “the economic, commercial and financial blockade” it has imposed against the island.

Anyone who knows the correct meaning of the word “blockade” knows that it is an act of war that impedes the arrival and departure of any means of transportation to and from a specific country. According to this elementary definition, then, the only blockade that exists in Cuba is the one imposed by its own government upon citizens who wish to leave the island in order to take advantage of a basic freedom that should not be denied to anyone.

The repression is so merciless that the desperate Cubans who dare to violate this blockade can even be sentenced to death, as happened less than two years ago to three citizens who attempted to seize a ferryboat to escape from the Cuban “paradise.”

What the Americans have imposed upon the Caribbean nation—and upon themselves, of course—is an embargo on trade and movement that severely limits all kinds of exchange between the two countries. While it is true that Cuba has borne that embargo (maybe useless or counterproductive) for a long time, the truth—as big as a cathedral—is that Cuba is perfectly free to trade with the rest of the entire world, as it doubtless does.

To call a simple unilateral embargo a “blockade” is to distort the meaning of the word, to politically dramatize a situation that, while disturbing, in no way prevents Cuba from developing its economy by whatever means it considers most convenient.

The Cuban government has been shrewd enough to take advantage of this circumstance, denouncing the embargo as the main cause of the abysmal backwardness and poverty in which Cuba’s inhabitants live. A few weeks ago, for example, Deputy Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Padilla showed the press an estimate that said Cuba had lost the fabulous sum of $82 billion because it couldn’t trade with the United States in the past 40 years. He therefore described the embargo as a true “act of genocide.”

It seems peculiar, to say the least, that a high official of the Castro regime should thus bewail the lack of commercial exchanges with his country. Doesn’t Mr. Rodríguez realize that, by denouncing these losses, he is confirming the fact that trade is a beneficial act for both parties and that every exchange brings profit to those who accomplish it?

The Castro regime prohibits free trade among the island’s citizens; it forbids people to engage in the economic activities that they may find most convenient; it does not allow its citizens to travel abroad and imposes rigorous prohibitions to any exchange, in the name of a socialism that brings only misery and backwardness to those who, strictly speaking, should be considered prisoners of the regime.

If trade brings so much benefit, why not allow Cubans to trade freely among themselves?

For the presidents and representatives of the countries at the Ibero-American Summit to denounce the U.S. embargo but remain silent before the brutal blockade that Fidel Castro imposes upon the Cubans themselves is a sad manifestation of servility and an ominous reminder of the fragility of our democracies.

There is much hypocrisy in all this. Perhaps there is even the desire to pacify the tyrant of the Caribbean to keep him from intervening, as he usually does, in the internal affairs of other countries, fomenting turmoil that could destabilize some governments.

The truth is that these declarations, meaningless though they may be to some, are a heavy burden that in no way helps to strengthen our democracies or to prevent that—as in Bolivia, Nicaragua or Venezuela—they again become populist or leftist dictatorships.


Carlos Sabino is an adjunct fellow with The Independent Institute, and a visiting professor and researcher at the Universidad Francisco Marroquín Foundation in Guatemala.






Home | About Us | Blogs | Issues | Newsroom | Multimedia | Events | Publications | Centers | Students | Store | Donate

Product Catalog | RSS | Jobs | Course Adoption | Links | Privacy Policy | Site Map
Facebook Facebook Facebook Facebook
Copyright 2014 The Independent Institute