Letter to the Editor:
In Run, Osama, Run (column, Jan. 23), Thomas L. Friedman ascribes Arab-Muslim sympathy for Osama bin Laden to a cultural resistance to believing anything good about America. Mr. Friedman does not distinguish between American society and the United States government actions around the world.
In a recent poll of global opinion leaders, including many in the Middle East, respondents admired the United States as the land of opportunity and democratic ideals. But a majority of non-United States respondents said American policies and actions in the world were responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks. Only a small percentage of American elites agreed.
Mr. Friedman and the rest of the American foreign policy establishment wring their hands trying to determine how to change the worlds perception of America. The only way is to change American foreign policy. Reducing United States meddling overseas would lower the level of animosity and make Americans much safer.
|Ivan Eland is Senior Fellow and Director of the Center on Peace & Liberty at the Independent Institute. Dr. Eland is a graduate of Iowa State University and received an M.B.A. in applied economics and Ph.D. in national security policy from George Washington University. He spent 15 years working for Congress on national security issues, including stints as an investigator for the House Foreign Affairs Committee and Principal Defense Analyst at the Congressional Budget Office.|
Taking a distinctly new approach, Ivan Eland profiles each U.S. president from Washington to Obama on the merits of his policies and whether those strategies contributed to peace, prosperity, and liberty. This ranking system is based on how effective each president was in fulfilling his oath to uphold the Constitution.