Its taken nearly two decades, but the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has finally given a green light for the pre-startup test of a new reactor at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Better late than never, perhaps, but the announcement should cause head scratching about why the United States is so far behind the nuclear curve.
The United States produces about one-third of the worlds nuclear-generated electricity, but many of its existing atomic power plants are technologically obsolete. When the Tennessee Valley Authority brings its Watts Bar Unit 2 online, the Generation II reactor will already have been surpassed by Generation III reactors in Canada, France and Japan.
Half a century ago, the United States was the only member of the global nuclear club. After detonating atomic bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Washingtons attention turned to civilian uses of nuclear power. Atoms for Peace was a catchphrase of the day. The Cold War was well underway then and civilian reactors were seen as a key producer of nuclear materials destined for military use.
|William F. Shughart II is Research Director and Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute, J. Fish Smith Professor in Public Choice in the Jon M. Huntsman School of Business at Utah State University, Editor-in-Chief of Public Choice, editor of the Independent Institute book, Taxing Choice: The Predatory Politics of Fiscal Discrimination, and co-author of the Independent Briefing, Plastic Pollution: Bans vs. Recycling Solutions.|
So-called sin taxesthe taxing of certain products, like alcohol and tobacco, that are deemed to be politically incorrecthave long been a favorite way for politicians to fund programs benefiting special interest groups. But this concept has been applied to such sinful products as soft drinks, margarine, telephone calls, airline tickets, and even fishing gear. What is the true record of this selective, often punitive, approach to taxation?