The Independent Institute En Espanol The Independent Institute
div1 div2 div3
div div

Police to Track All Vehicles into New York City

The New York City Police Department is now planning on tracking the movements of all vehicles entering Manhattan in a federally funded program designated “Operation Sentinel.” Of course, this massive assault on privacy is being done to track and screen out “terrorism.” And according to the Associated Press:

Police say Operation Sentinel would rely on license-plate readers, radiation detectors and closed-circuit cameras installed at the 16 bridges and four tunnels serving Manhattan. About a million vehicles drive onto the island every day. The vehicle data would be analyzed by computers programmed with information about suspicious vehicles. . . . There is no estimate yet of the cost, because Operation Sentinel is in just the planning phase.

The first real point here is that the New York City police are admitting that since they neither know who are actual terrorists or how to find them, everyone is a criminal suspect and will be monitored in the stereotypical bureaucratic belief that extracting information on everyone will somehow solve the problem. But, don’t worry:

Police say law-abiding people have nothing to fear: Vehicle data deemed innocent would be purged after 30 days.

Translation: spying, collecting files, and then keeping the information on permanent record is entirely at the discretion of the police bureaucracy. In all:

The plan calls for 116 stationary and mobile license-plate readers and 3,000 closed-circuit cameras that would be monitored by officers at a command center.

The official, 585-page 9/11 Commission Report indicates that government agencies utterly failed even though they had all the information they needed to identify and apprehend terrorists that attacked the World Trade Center and elsewhere, and most of this information was based on tips, not public surveillance. According to Fred Kaplan at Slate:

It turns out that many individuals, panels, and agencies had predicted an attack uncannily similar to what happened on Sept. 11, 2001. The problem was that nobody in a position of power felt compelled to do anything about it.

The second point is that the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights states that, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated . . . .” But this has certainly not stopped government intrusions into the private lives of innocent people, all of which is based on the “precautionary principle” that abridging the rights of a peaceful, law-abiding individual is justified even if the risk of harm is negligible. But once again, the end never justifies the means, and the rule of law is based on the enduring principles that every person is innocent until proven guilty and that no one, including the police and other government officials, has the right to infringe on the rights of others.

As Benjamin Franklin noted in 1775:

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

And the lessons of this great insight are superbly discussed in Senior Fellow Robert Higgs’s recent book, Neither Liberty Nor Safety: Fear, Ideology, and the Growth of Government. Security of course remains a very real issue and in fact crucial to securing liberty and a lawful society, but non-invasive, cooperative, private measures are the solution, as Senior Fellow Bruce Benson shows in his book, To Serve and Protect: Privatization and Community in Criminal Justice.

7 Comment(s)

  1. But once again, the end never justifies the means, and the rule of law is based on the enduring principles that every person is innocent until proven guilty and that no one, including the police and other government officials, has the right to infringe on the rights of others.

    I don’t think you’ve stated that correctly.

    Milton Friedman wrote (1962, Capitalism and Freedom): “A common objection to totalitarian societies is that they regard the end as justifying the means. Taken literally, this objection is clearly illogical. If the end does not justify the means, what does? But this easy answer does not dispose of the objection; it simply shows that the objection is not well put. To deny that the end justifies the means is indirectly to assert that the end in question is not the ultimate end, that the ultimate end is itself the use of proper means. Desirable or not, any end that can be attained only by the use of bad means must give way to the more basic end of the use of acceptable means.”

    That is to say, total security is not a realistic end. We can never be 100% safe. We should aim to be as safe as is consistent with the constitution and the rule of law. So what you mean to say is that policymakers are pursuing the wrong end, not that the end does not justify the means (indeed, the ends always justify the means, that is a truism).

    The problem is also that, in the case of tracking vehicles, the means won’t achieve the stated ends (of improving security). Just as torture won’t guarantee reliable information.

    What libertarians should be saying is that “Freedom Works”. The end (of improving security) is best achieved by other means (of reducing foreign intervention, etc.).

    Sukrit | Aug 21, 2008 | Reply

  2. Sukrit,

    You have correctly re-stated the rationale of utilitarian ethics (a la Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Milton Friedman, John Rawls and most other “modernists”) that claims that the choice of means should only really be constrained by whether a desired end is obtained. However, this is exactly the fallacy of utilitarianism. The issue is not just whether any means achieves a desired end because every means is an end in itself. Means are chosen actions which themselves have ethical content, and every act produces outcomes that do not disappear when an end state is reached. The end is in fact only the culmination of the means.

    Furthermore, the basis for selecting an end state itself as desirable is always based on an objective ground of moral principle (natural law). For example and as you note, “security” is such a desirable or “good” end based on objective moral criteria, but each means to achieve “security” must also be subject to the same objective moral norms. And, either ethical norms exist as objectively true and universal or not. If they do not, then the claimed end of “security” itself is meaningless and cannot be asserted as a “good.”

    The problem with utilitarianism is that it suspends moral ethics for means but then insists that ethics magically reappear to determine proper ends. This moral ambiguity and situational ethics is intrinsic to utilitarianism and why utilitarianism is at best a shifting sands and at worst a rationale for tyranny. If individual rights, the rule of law, and the Golden Rule can always be suspended for some future end state, then individual rights, the rule of law, and Golden Rule are not viewed as objective moral principles. The utilitarian hence faces an unworkable dilemma.

    As C.S. Lewis notes in critiquing the “long-run” (ends) of utilitarianism in his book, The Abolition of Man:

    “Either we are rational spirit for ever to obey the absolute value of the Tao [natural law], or else we are mere nature to be kneaded and cut into shapes for the pleasures of masters who must, by hypothesis, have no motive but their own ‘natural’ impulses. Only the Tao provides a common human law of action which can over-arch rulers and ruled alike. A dogmatic belief in objective value is necessary to the very idea of a rule which is not tyranny or an obedience which is not slavery. . . . The process which, if unchecked, will abolish Man goes on apace among Communists and Democrats no less than among Fascists. . . . [M]any a mild-eyed scientist in pince-nez, many a popular dramatist, many an amateur philosopher in our midst, means in the long run just the same as the Nazi rulers of Germany.”

    David Theroux | Aug 21, 2008 | Reply

  3. Ends do not justify means. An end is something that is aimed for. But means produce a plethora of results, some more intended than others. The ends are only a small part of the actual results. To justify the means, all their (rationally expectable) results would have to be justified.

    Reino Ruusu | Aug 23, 2008 | Reply

  4. How can such rational answers fall on such deaf ears? I just don’t understand my fellow Americans any more.

    daddysteve | Aug 28, 2008 | Reply

  5. That the Swiss and the American people, still those persons government, them are using the money as weapon power.
    Many other world’s people them want to be able to use them money as weapon as also.
    As money can be weapon.
    In the past the American expresident 1986, he declare, that he want to end with the power from the Swiss people, because can’t be how easy for them to use money as weapon.
    The Swiss them attack in any country them want,
    That it is a big trouble, that many world’s people, in the moist the politics and the banks workers, them hate, to die, plus them got jealous, as how the rich people, them win them fresh money,
    An can spend them, many rich people, them notice, how the Swiss bank workers them studied, how to be thief, of money, how to kill rich people, how to be jealous, that it is terrorism inside the Swiss bank.
    Them want to live the same fresh life, but them with out business places, the Swiss workers them want to live same fresh life with stolid money, them want with war, the Swiss said that hurts as more.
    And them place them in the Swiss bank, any boy want to live a fresh life,
    But not, the Swiss people, and the politics people, them believing the world it does for them, with making mad.

    The biggest troubles it is that any body wants to live them life eating and drinking in gorgeous expensive places with out working.

    Well fine, many them know that the Swiss banks, them making, team with mad politics, to kill to the rich proud legally people, it for the Swiss workers, to can stole them money, from that nasty team to live a nasty fresh mad life.
    The other truth it is that those bank workers, and mad politics them must to go to live, them life to communist countries.

    That it is the big trouble, my self I had troubles with the Swiss bank’s workers, where I have place legally money.
    The Swiss bank workers them want to be richer with making war.

    Making war, it is, that the Swiss bank’s workers, them are fix a team with the American treasure department Spanish woman, with Mexican politics, with students from the school from science in the Guadalajara city Mexico, paying to the student from the Iberoamericana, from the Mexico capital and paying to German government people, it does a terrorist war, to can stole the bank money from mister Howard Hughes.
    SINCE EVER, AFTER MISTER HUGHES HE SING IT, THE LEGALY TESTAMNET, UNDER LEGACCY, LEAVING HIS GOODS AND MONEY TO HIS LEGALL SON, UNDER NAME LUDOVICCI HUGHES, the Swiss workers them want to kill to the son and his family, with the same help from all those nasty crew of persons. The same team, Them how poor and jealous, many countries them want to make an auditorship at the Swiss bank, at any cost even, the same war, the Swiss them doesn’t have the right to be fresh with the others money plus, a suppose to be the Swiss country it is a neutral political country, well there are proves that the Swiss bank’s workers, them are making talks, of politics with other countries.-
    Those nasty psycho bank workers, so what with stolid money, them want to drive roll Royce cars.
    With stolid money upon them kill to people, as a mad kids,
    In the present times, the Swiss workers; they are making team with the American army to kill legally people.
    For the American army and Swiss people,to spend a rich life.
    The Swiss bank worker, the American army, with the men under name mc namara, he went to Swiss 1982, to make the plane to attack the United States of American presidency.
    The American army and the American presidency them are never in fine good contact.
    The American army them are ever in contact with the American treasure department, and with the Swiss bank workers to make terrorist attack to America, them doesn’t talking to the American president.
    And to stole the Americans people with Swiss war. the Spanish woman inside in the treasure department from the united states, THEM DID THE ATTACK TO THE AMERICAN EXPRESIDENT 1986.
    That nasty same team, the Swiss bank people, the American army,the same nasty woman from the treasure department from the united state of America.
    Now plus, with the mad political people from the Mexican state jalisco, in the Guadalajara city, in Mexico.
    Them want to kill to the legal owner from the Howard Hughes testament, under legacy.
    Biggest insurance companies actually many of them , them are making safe for the Howard Hughes, son, politically kidnapped, sine time ago, that makes also war.
    The American expresident he declares the war, to the thief’s people and countries actually at the Swiss bank workers. Because the owner he did and American men, any money is going to the American bank, never to the terrorist hands.
    Those insurance companies, them are fighting at the Swiss bank to safe the life to the Howard Hughes son, but the Swiss bank people, them are fighting at the public in Guadalajara Mexico to can kill to the Howard Hughes son,
    Those thief people from the Swiss bank, them are making how fresh them war, using the money as weapon, paying to kill, well as money can be weapon, any body going to use money as weapon.

    Many persons them know that the, Swiss Bank, them send to kill to, them bank client’s, so what, around with many other.
    It like the plane crashed, leaving from San Carlos de bariloche in the Argentinean country in the 1961 year.
    When that plane were taking of, from Argentina, the plane got, as to crash in the Chile’s cordillera de los Andes.
    In that plane them were making trip the famous singer, mrs Marie Callas, and her son Ludovicci Hughes.
    Much of time, an odd Swiss elder person, he were talking very much with her son, from mrs Marie callas, with Ludovicci.
    Mrs Maria callas, she got mad with the men, and mrs Marie callas she question, why? the elder men does talking how much with her son.
    Mrs Maria callas she pay, money to that men, to tell her the true, after some time that men, he say the true to mrs Marie callas, the elder men, he say, that the Swiss bank them send him to kill to her young son Ludovvici Hughes.
    That the Swiss bank them were paying as much as 100,000.00 one hundred thousand dollars, to him.
    Mrs Maria callas she said to the man that, she will pay half million dollars for leaving them free and alive.
    Some how the elder men, he had give the instructions to the plane pilot, to land in a safe land road almost with out snow, to simulate a plane crashed, the pilot he gave the turn to the left, when he were taking off, many passengers them say them noticed of that, to avoid the cordillera the pilot he must to do the right turn.

    After 15 minutes, the pilot he said he have troubles with the snow, and he is going to effort the plane to land any were where he can.
    The pilot he said to the passenger, that in the first small road he find, he is going to land, he command to any passenger to put the security belt,
    After a few turn the pilot, he find a land road up in Andes cordillera.
    First when he start to make the landing safely, almost the plane where ready to stop, but the pilot he crashed the plane any way true some rocks.
    After the plane crash, the Swiss bank worker, he command to any body with a shut gun in his hand, to don’t move any body.
    The many passengers, many alive and many death, because them didn’t put them security belt, a woman alive with out the security belt, she say she didn’t put his security belt, because she wish to die.
    The pilot he call to any body to don’t move until them call for help, the pilot he call with the plane’s radio.
    the Argentinean government them command to the pilot to don’t use the radio any more, them want every ting about to be a secret, until the news people arrive, to that scene of the accident, time after the accident, the pilot he command, to any persons alive, to walk out side, the crashed plane.
    He order to his crew people, to make a close supervision, for how many person alive, and how many persons them are death.
    Many person alive, it like 17 seventeen, mrs Marie Calls she got a broken leg, her son he got hurt in his noose, but them alive, the pilot he command to a crew woman to supervise, how much food, it does in the survivors place, she said there are 40 tuna fish can.
    After two hours, mister Howard Hughes, he did the first in talking by the radio, and he asking to the pilot how his relative them are alive? The pilot he said proudly, yes them are alive.
    The American candidate running for the presidency 1961, he call to the Argentinean government to take safe, for mrs Marie Callas, and her son.
    The life guards, them ask to the pilot where, is it is located, the plane crashed, the pilot he answer, he got lost with the snow storm, he can’t know, the life guard them answer, it is impossible to get there by flying by helicopter, because the plane where flying how hi, to avoid the cordillera de los Andes, but the storm, throw the plane, into the mountains.
    The life guards them said it is going to take like three week, to get there and to find the crash plane.
    The pilot he command to any man to make care for the death bodies inside the crash plane, them said them are 24 deaths, the pilot he command to take them very carefully, but the pilot, he change in his mine, and he command to any body to cave into. the peace of land, first 24 caves, and to wait, two days.
    The pilot he said to any body, to come on, that he knows, every ting about that laws, that after two days had pass, them are going to place the death into the caves, he command to take carefully to any death body, and to place them in them caves, many person alive them got cry, because the two days waiting.
    After two, weeks past with any body walking a few around and eating tuna fish with cookies, and boiling snow to drink water, and talking to each other, the Swiss elder men he make it a friendship with a Brazilian person passenger survivor, the Swiss person, he said that he got command it, by a Swiss bank, to find troubles for the Howard Hughes son, the Swiss elder men he command to the Brazilian person, that he is going to pay big money to the Brazilian person, to follow his commanding, that to walk to as far, where the death bodies are, and to take, two death body out side, the Brazilian person, he ask but why? He doesn’t want that to do, the Swiss bank worker he effort it, for more as a million dollar money.
    The Brazilian he went to do, as the Swiss worker command, the pilot he got noticed and he broke the noose to the Brazilian men, the Swiss bank worker, he run to fight to the pilot, them start to fight, the many other survivors, them start to hate to the Brazilian did.
    The pilot he command to take care, and to watch any wrong move those two person doing, when three week had past, the pilot he effort with hurts to the Swiss men to say why?, he took the death bodies, out side the peace of land, the Swiss bank worker he said, the truth, to the pilot, because the pilot he said, believe it or not I’m the only authority in this plane.
    Then the pilot he command with hurts to tell the truth to the Swiss bank worker. And the bank worker he said that, he took the death bodies, out side for him to can lie to the news paper, when them arrive to the scene of the crash plane, and to can say to other persons, that others did take the bodies out side.
    The pilot he said any how, I’m going to say the truth, to the news paper, because the pilot he only can say the thrut.
    The Swiss bank worker he said, desperate, like a worry woman, to the pilot, you can’t win to Swiss bank’s money, because, he have big money to pay any body to can lie, the Swiss bank worker he were suggesting to the pilot to lie, the pilot he said he have enough money, to live his own life.
    The Argentinean presidency, them said them don’t believe in the Swiss bank worker lien.
    Any how the Argentinean government, them call to take safe and alive to mrs Marie Callas and his son.
    The Argentinean government, them noticed that them were not guilty of any crime and them leave them to left the Argentinean country alive.
    But a last tip, as suppose to be, the Swiss bank worker, he took unfree to the pilot, days before, them had ready a land road, in the Chile’s country, up in the Andes cordillera, for the Swiss bank worker, to can kill to the mrs Hughes wife and son.
    But the Argentinean government, them declare to the news world, of and odd, that them noticed when the plane, took off and make the left turn, going into the cordillera de los Andes, this where the Swiss workers, plan to kill to them bank’s clients.
    It is ever the same tell with the Swiss worker, that them spend a lot of trick to kill to people, it like how ridiculous the Swiss them are, almost the insurance them help to stay alive, but none body them must to believe in the nasty Swiss people working.
    When the life guard them arrive, the Swiss bank worker, he took a knife and he cut a peace of his own stomach skin, he said to make a revenge, because he didn’t succeed, he said he is going to spend a Swiss war, at an body at he said.,

    ________________________________________

    ________________________________________
    AirDisaster.Com Accident Database
    » AirDisaster.Com » Accident Database » Accident Synopsis » 04031961

    Date of Accident: 03 April 1961

    Airline: LAN

    Aircraft: Douglas DC-3

    Location: Llico, Chile

    Registration: CC-C-LDP

    Previous Registrations: —

    Flight Number: —

    Fatalities: 24:24

    MSN: 9716

    Line Number: —

    Engine Manufacturer: —

    Engine Model: —

    Year of Delivery: —

    Accident Description: The aircraft lost control and crashed in icing conditions.

    anonymous | Nov 6, 2008 | Reply

  6. Add to my Bookmarks :)

    alex | Dec 9, 2008 | Reply

  7. It seems like something is missing, no?

    Travel Russia | Mar 23, 2009 | Reply

1 Trackback(s)

  1. Aug 21, 2008: from Police to Track All Vehicles into New York City | [I'm a] PC Site

Post a Comment